Publish manuscript:Please read the guidelines for writers

The key concern of Tobacco Control is give a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which are prone to further the objectives of the comprehensive tobacco control policy. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.

Documents firmly anchored to a strategic policy and programme context are more inclined to be accepted for book. Due to the fact log seeks to achieve a readership that is international writers must look into whether their intended submissions address issues or themes, that are apt to be of great interest to scientists employed in other countries. Extremely parochial problems, that incorporate few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to be provided with high concern. The manuscripts editors will generally maybe maybe not provide priority that is high:

Studies of cigarette smoking prevalence and its own correlates. They are most suitable to journals that are national. Few individuals residing outside nation have an interest in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette smokers.
Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace teams or health care professionals. Once again, they are better suited to national journals or even wellness speciality that is professional. Few individuals far away could be enthusiastic about (for instance) whether nurses in a local medical center are enthusiastic about helping patients quit. Nationwide studies, and the ones using such studies into initial areas are of more interest.
Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. They are documents with findings that appear to hold no importance that is obvious changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but take us anywhere don’t essential or interesting.
Advice pieces where in fact the views are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or disregard for crucial ethical problems in favor of sloganeering.
Documents that show the writers have not exposed Tobacco Control and don't comprehend its focus that is primary on control in the place of on tobacco as well as its usage and wellness effects. We have been enthusiastic about such documents, but only when their writers address the implications of the findings for tobacco control.
Papers with glaringly apparent, deadly methodological issues.
Documents on topics that want extremely technical or discipline-specific language not likely to be comprehended by the greater part of visitors.
Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little new information.
Neighborhood studies where in fact the implications for the journal’s audience that is international not clear.
Reports written for governments or regional wellness authorities that some body thought could be offered an instant make-over and presented as a log paper.

Editorial policy

Tobacco Control adheres into the greatest criteria concerning its editorial policies on book ethics, clinical misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To look at all BMJ Journal policies please relate to the BMJ Author Hub policies web page.

Articles are posted under a licence that is exclusive non-exclusive licence for British Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. For people authorities officers or workers acting included in their formal duties, the terms are as mentioned prior to our licence terms. Writers or their employers retain copyright. Start access articles may be reused beneath the regards to the appropriate innovative Commons licence to facilitate reuse of this content; please relate to the Tobacco Control Author Licence when it comes to applicable Creative Commons licences”.

Tobacco industry funded work

Tobacco Control will likely not give consideration to for publication documents reporting work funded, in entire or in component, by way of a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the journal consider documents by writers whom accept tobacco industry financing, including money for research expenses, for several or section of any author’s income, or other types of individual remuneration. For more information, please look at this editorial offering the thinking behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare interests that are competing distribution, or whenever a write-up is commissioned, can lead to instant rejection associated with paper. If your contending interest comes to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue an official modification to or retraction for the entire paper, as appropriate.

Material previously published online

Tobacco Control is happy to start thinking about documents based wholly or perhaps in component on product previously published on the web. Nonetheless writers must look into an editorial about this topic: Prior book on the internet: brand brand new log policy. The editor keeps the right that is customary make modifications any way you like of course essential to reduce, utilizing the approval associated with author(s), material accepted for publication. Any written or illustrative material that happens to be posted somewhere else should be duly recognized and associated with the penned consent of this copyright owner (this might be the publisher as opposed to the writer).

Fast monitoring

Under unique circumstances in which a paper’s findings have actually straight away policy that is relevant warranting urgent book, manuscripts are fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. If you feel you feel it is of sufficient importance to be handled urgently that you have good reasons why this is true for your paper, please detail these in a cover letter, explaining the importance of your work for the field and the reason. This demand will not guarantee that the editors will agree, and just a couple of papers per year will soon be expedited with this foundation, however it can help the editors to judge the paper’s value when you look at the present context.

Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts

Documents on e cigarettes should make use of the term cigarettes that are‘electronic on very very first usage, after which it the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be utilized. Documents on other delivery that is nicotine may continue steadily to utilize the definition of ‘electronic smoking distribution systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very very first use.

Whenever uploading a revised manuscript, writers must also consist of an independent manuscript file showcasing the tracked changes to exhibit the editors the real difference through the past variation. The monitored modifications document should really be uploaded as a supplementary file.

Analysis gu > that is reporting

BMJ calls for conformity towards the following reporting tips. Please upload the appropriate finished list for the submission to your study type, and label it “Research checklist”. If no appropriate list can be obtained for the research kind, this is often indicated in the distribution kind.

CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised managed studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for several financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for many research that is diagnostic
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for several quality enhancement studies

Guidance and types can be obtained from EQUATOR.

We welcome video abstracts to come with accepted research articles. These enable authors to actually talk through their work beyond the limitations of a formal article to improve the user’s understanding. Note that individuals will likely not request you to give consideration to publishing a video clip abstract until your paper happens to be accepted. Please don't try to upload a video clip abstract upon initial distribution of one's manuscript.

There are numerous tutorials online that could guide the production of a video clip abstract, using commonly and sometimes software that is freely available. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie will be the many examples that are common. Samples of video clip abstracts can be found from The BMJ. Here are a few instructions for making a video clip abstract. Writers might also wish to ask their institution’s press/media office for support.

Movie abstracts must not go longer than 4 moments.
This content and concentrate associated with the movie must connect straight to the scholarly research which has been accepted paid essays for book, and really should perhaps maybe not stray beyond the info. We advice itself i.e. briefly outline the background/context of the study, present your research objective, outline the methods used, present the key results and then discuss the implications of the outcomes that you follow the same structure as the paper.
The presentation and content associated with the movie is in a mode plus in terms which will be understandable and accessible to a basic medical audience. The language that is main be English, but we welcome subtitles in another language. Please avoid jargon that will not be acquainted to a broad audience that is medical plus don't utilize abbreviations.
Writers often talk directly into the digital camera and/or provide a slideshow, but we encourage the usage of other appropriate artistic and material that is audiosuch as for instance animations, videos, nevertheless photographs, figures, infographics). If you want to make use of product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions through the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.